The Greatest Guide To h4831 vs h4831sc
The Greatest Guide To h4831 vs h4831sc
Blog Article
However IMR 4831 and H4831SC are various powders, you'll discover that in several cases, in which one of them is mentioned the opposite will likely be at the same time. Also, you will find there is a reasonably reliable romantic relationship concerning them with reference to listed loads.
I've used H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There usually are not a lot of cartridges that I utilize it for as I seem to be generally to gravitate to other powders. Even so, I can't mention that it will not work. It is simply that Several other powders function improved for any given cartridge. By way of example, during the 280, H4831 gave me excellent velocity and really good groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally far better in precision, though the velocity was nearly equivalent.
It is possible that no further more discussion is necessary, where situation we propose starting a completely new thread. If however you feel your response is needed you can still do this.
With all the 154 grain Hornady SP during the 280, H4831 gave me excellent teams and excellent velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a considerably increased velocity and presents marginally far better accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally far better. Therefore, in Every single of such cases I went with another powder, but I would definitely dislike to divest myself of your H4831.
IMR powders also preform very well for me with a person noteworthy exception. Many of the chrongraphing I've done with them indicates the velecity is consistant above 32 levels but starts to differ as soon h4831sc as the temp begins to fall. The closer to zero I get the more they differ. I have viewed about 250 fps in a ten shot string with my 243 and 223 while in the Winter season time close to listed here. Have not seen this with many of the other powders.
Due to the fact there will not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can many of you give a starting point with this mixture and things to consider when Doing work this Load up?
Any one loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data it is possible to share? Must also mention I have some ELD-X 175's h4831 vs h4831sc I would want to exam out, When you've got details on that likewise.
Although this is most likely accurate, there's a good deal additional to it than simply not blowing you up. He could not strike prairie pet dogs beyond about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't h4831sc load data undertaking just about anything favorable for his grouping ability with All those loads.
While using the shorter cut Variation powder will come as many as The bottom on the decrease shoulder so I even now have a great deal of space.
[email guarded] gn and a hundred and fifteen CT's, I've killed much more Deer with this particular combo than all the rifles I own put together, Work around this although the sweet spot will probably be around fifty four, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I have some stuff tat performs very well for me if your intrigued
Kansas City, MO I'd get whatsoever is available at the moment. I’ve applied both even though with my check out load and didn’t see anything distinct general performance clever.
The "SC" stands for Quick Lower. I have never seen a difference between possibly powder dut I do not Assume I might mix them.
I frequently normally have the sc Model. Utilizing a powder measure it hangs up much less because of shorter kernels and I believe will allow extra reliable metering so a lot less time you're taking trickling in the last little bit of cost to produce excess weight. So basically the SC will save you moments
The truth that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you happen to be seeing increased velocities attained with that powder, rather than Anything you've observed While using the IMR stuff.